Paradise Homes North West Inc. v. Sidhu, 2019 ONSC 1600 | Remax

Paradise Homes North West Inc. v. Sidhu, 2019 ONSC 1600

March 17, 2019

CATEGORY NAME

INTERESTING CASE: Paradise Homes North West Inc. v. Sidhu, 2019 ONSC 1600

SUMMARY:
Buyer enters APS dated March 4, 2017 to purchase 10 Truro Circle in Brampton, Ontario for $819,990.
APS required payment of pay five deposits. 4 were paid by the Buyer and the 5th was defaulted. Buyer requested an extension and subsequently the cheque was returned NSF.
Buyer requested assignment of the APS to his cousins. The Seller permitted notwithstanding the APS including a “no assignment” clause for an assignment fee of $25,000 + $1,000 in legal fees.
Buyer refused to pay and insisted he was entitled to assign, defaulted on the 5th deposit, and failed to close the transaction ultimately.
Buyer alleges FRUSTRATION of the contract due to Market Conditions or by the fee charged by the Vendor. And further denies that the Vendor mitigated its damages reasonably.
The property was listed for $729,000, which was higher than the appraised value of $700,000. It was shown 34 times over a two week period, with only one offer received, which was accepted by Paradise Homes. It was sold for $715,000.
[8] As a result of the defendant’s defaults, Paradise Homes incurred losses from the aborted sale equal to the difference between the original and the ultimate sale prices, plus the carrying and sale costs as follows:
1. Difference between the original and ultimate sale prices
$93,061.51

2. Real Estate Commission
$28,600.00

3. Staging Costs
$2,900.00

4. Cleaning Costs
$700.00

5. Gas for the period April 2018 to June 2018
$447.19

6. Hydro for the period April 2018 to June 2018
$285.18

7. Realty taxes
$815.62

8. Appraisal Report
$250.00

9. Total deficiency
$127,059.50

After deducting the Buyer’s deposit of $45,000, the plaintiff’s damages total $82,059.50.

Summary judgement in favour of the Vendor granted.

Key Take-aways:
1) ensure your contract is reviewed so you do not end up surprised when the builder uses the contract you signed to refuse an assignment or insists on egregious amounts in exchange for the consent to assign
2) changing market factors are not deemed to frustrate the agreement

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2019/2019onsc1600/2019onsc1600.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQALcmVhbCBlc3RhdGUAAAAAAQ


DISCLAIMER

Ricky Rathore., BComm., LL.B (Hons.), ABR®, SRS, FRI, Broker of Record – RE/MAX EMPIRE REALTY, BROKERAGE is a licensed Barrister and Solicitor.

The material on our website is intended to provide only general information and comment only. Members of our staff use their best efforts to ensure that the information found on our website is accurate and timely. However such information should be confirmed by the reader and should not be relied on either directly or indirectly as Legal advice. Please contact us for more information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ABOUT

We are the home of the best in Real Estate & those who aspire to be.

CONTACT US

Address:
RE/MAX EMPIRE REALTY, BROKERAGE 92 & 93 – 8321 KENNEDY ROAD, MARKHAM, ON L3R 5N4
Email:
Phone:
Fax:

SEND US A MESSAGE

© REMAX - all rights reserved